Comparison and Analysis of Protocols for the Secure Binding Updates in MIPv6


The KIPS Transactions:PartC, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 755-762, Oct. 2003
10.3745/KIPSTC.2003.10.6.755,   PDF Download:

Abstract

For the route optimization in the MIPv6, MN (Mobile Node) sends CN (Correspondent Node) a binding update message to notify the binding of its HoA (Home Address) with its new CoA (Care-of Address). However, unauthenticated binding updates expose the involved MN and CN to various security attacks. Thus, protecting the binding update process becomes of paramount importance in the MIPv6, and several secure binding update protocols have been proposed. In this paper, we present the criterions for comparing the protocols’s security including the vulnerability to the attacks, the manageability of protocol, and the performance of packet exchanges and cryptographic operations. Then, we analyze the four typical binding update protocols based on the presented criterions. In addition, we propose some improvement tips for secure binding updates.


Statistics
Show / Hide Statistics

Statistics (Cumulative Counts from September 1st, 2017)
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view.
If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


Cite this article
[IEEE Style]
W. Y. Seog and J. G. San, "Comparison and Analysis of Protocols for the Secure Binding Updates in MIPv6," The KIPS Transactions:PartC, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 755-762, 2003. DOI: 10.3745/KIPSTC.2003.10.6.755.

[ACM Style]
Won Yu Seog and Jo Gyeong San. 2003. Comparison and Analysis of Protocols for the Secure Binding Updates in MIPv6. The KIPS Transactions:PartC, 10, 6, (2003), 755-762. DOI: 10.3745/KIPSTC.2003.10.6.755.