Evaluation of Digital Elevation Models by Interpreting Correlations


The KIPS Transactions:PartB , Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 141-148, Apr. 2004
10.3745/KIPSTB.2004.11.2.141,   PDF Download:

Abstract

The ground positions and elevations information called DEMs(Digital Elevation Models) which are extracted from the stereo aerial photographs and/r satellite images using image matching method have the natural errors caused by variant environments. This study suggests the method to evaluate DEMs using correlation values between the reference and the target DEMs. This would be strongly helpful for experts to correct these errors. To evaluate the whole area of DEMs in the horizontal and vertical errors, the target cell is matched for each reference cell using the correlation values of these two cells. When the target cell is matched for each reference cell, horizontal and vertical error was calculated so as to help experts to recognize a certain area of DEMs which should be corrected and edited. If the correlation value is low and the difference in height is high, the target cell will be candidated as changed or corrupted cell. When the area is clustered with those candidated cells, that area will be regarded as changed or corrupted area to be corrected and edited. Using this method, the evaluation for all DEM cells is practicable, the horizontal errors as well as vertical errors is calculable and the changed or corrupted area can be detected more efficiently.


Statistics
Show / Hide Statistics

Statistics (Cumulative Counts from September 1st, 2017)
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view.
If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


Cite this article
[IEEE Style]
L. S. U and O. H. Seog, "Evaluation of Digital Elevation Models by Interpreting Correlations," The KIPS Transactions:PartB , vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 141-148, 2004. DOI: 10.3745/KIPSTB.2004.11.2.141.

[ACM Style]
Lee Seung U and O Hae Seog. 2004. Evaluation of Digital Elevation Models by Interpreting Correlations. The KIPS Transactions:PartB , 11, 2, (2004), 141-148. DOI: 10.3745/KIPSTB.2004.11.2.141.