Comparison and Analysis of Mobility Support Schemes for NGN standardization plan


The KIPS Transactions:PartC, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 659-668, Oct. 2006
10.3745/KIPSTC.2006.13.5.659,   PDF Download:

Abstract

Various schemes for mobility support are currently proposed in NGN. However the performance comparison of all existing schemes is not relatively examined as yet. Therefore, in this paper, we investigate the location registration and handover procedure of MIPv6, IP2, Q.MMF, IMS, compare and analyze the location registration time and cost and handover latency time using various performance parameters and simulation for the performance analysis. As a result of analysis, when Location Manager locates in the center of core network, IP2 showed better performance than other schemes.


Statistics
Show / Hide Statistics

Statistics (Cumulative Counts from September 1st, 2017)
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view.
If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


Cite this article
[IEEE Style]
M. J. Yu, J. M. Lee, H. J. Kim, S. G. Choi, T. S. Jeong, "Comparison and Analysis of Mobility Support Schemes for NGN standardization plan," The KIPS Transactions:PartC, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 659-668, 2006. DOI: 10.3745/KIPSTC.2006.13.5.659.

[ACM Style]
Myoung Ju Yu, Jong Min Lee, Hyun Jong Kim, Seong Gon Choi, and Tae Soo Jeong. 2006. Comparison and Analysis of Mobility Support Schemes for NGN standardization plan. The KIPS Transactions:PartC, 13, 5, (2006), 659-668. DOI: 10.3745/KIPSTC.2006.13.5.659.