Analysis of Adaptive Cycle Packet Drop and Non-Adaptive Cycle Packet Drop for Congestion Control in Internet


KIPS Transactions on Computer and Communication Systems, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 783-788, Oct. 2002
10.3745/KIPSTC.2002.9.5.783,   PDF Download:

Abstract

Adaptive Cyclic Packet Dropping algorithm (ACPD), and Non-adaptive Cyclic Packet Dropping algorithm (NCPD) are applying stricter drop precedence than that of RIO algorithm. Especially, the ACPD algorithm drops adaptively packets for the congestion control, as predicting traffic pattern between each cycle. Therefore the ACPD algorithm makes up for the drawback of RIO algorithm and minimizes the wastes of the bandwidth being capable of predicting in the NCPD algorithm. And we executed a simulation and analyzed the throughput and packet drop rate based on Sending Priority changing dynamically depending on network traffic. In this algorithm, applying strict drop precedence policy, we get better performance on priority levels. The results show that the proposed algorithms may provide more efficient and stricter drop precedence policy as compared to RIO independent of traffic load. The ACPD algorithm can provide better performance on priority levels and keep stricter drop policy than RIO and the NCPD algorithm.


Statistics
Show / Hide Statistics

Statistics (Cumulative Counts from September 1st, 2017)
Multiple requests among the same browser session are counted as one view.
If you mouse over a chart, the values of data points will be shown.


Cite this article
[IEEE Style]
S. Y. Kim and H. K. Kahng, "Analysis of Adaptive Cycle Packet Drop and Non-Adaptive Cycle Packet Drop for Congestion Control in Internet," KIPS Journal C (2001 ~ 2012) , vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 783-788, 2002. DOI: 10.3745/KIPSTC.2002.9.5.783.

[ACM Style]
Su Yeon Kim and Hyun Kook Kahng. 2002. Analysis of Adaptive Cycle Packet Drop and Non-Adaptive Cycle Packet Drop for Congestion Control in Internet. KIPS Journal C (2001 ~ 2012) , 9, 5, (2002), 783-788. DOI: 10.3745/KIPSTC.2002.9.5.783.